Delhi Assembly Forms 32 Committees for 2026‑27 Session, BJP and AAP Get Proportional Seats
Delhi Assembly Secretariat establishes 32 committees for the 2026‑27 legislative year, assigning chairmanships to BJP and AAP members and ensuring proportional representation.
The Delhi Legislative Assembly has created 32 committees for the 2026‑27 session. Chairmanships are split between the ruling BJP and opposition AAP, reflecting their strength in the house.
Delhi Assembly, Legislative Committees, BJP, AAP, Vishender Gupta, Mohan Singh Bisht, Delhi politics, 2026‑27 session, committee chairmanship, proportional representation
New Delhi, 18 June 2026 – The Secretariat of the Delhi Legislative Assembly announced the formation of thirty‑two standing committees for the fiscal year 2026‑27. The decision, taken on the instructions of Assembly Speaker Vijender Gupta, aims to streamline legislative work and enhance oversight of public welfare matters.
According to an official press release issued on Thursday, Speaker Gupta will preside over five of the newly constituted committees. Deputy Speaker Mohan Singh Bisht has been appointed the head of three committees, focusing on government assurances, questions and references, as well as peace and harmony.
The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) will chair the majority of the committees, reflecting its dominant position in the 70‑member house, where it holds 48 seats. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), the principal opposition with 22 legislators, will also receive chairmanships of two key committees: the one dealing with documents submitted on the “entry‑ratna” (entry‑level) portal and the committee overseeing the “pratyayojit vidhān” (drafted legislation) process.
All other committees will be headed by BJP members, as specified in the Secretariat’s statement. The allocation follows a proportional representation formula, ensuring that both parties have a voice commensurate with their legislative strength.
Speaker Gupta will also chair the committees on Legislative Business, Private Member Bills and Motions, Rules, General Administration, and the Library. These bodies are expected to supervise the procedural aspects of the Assembly’s functioning and facilitate smoother passage of bills.
Deputy Speaker Bisht’s responsibilities include leading committees that monitor government promises, handle parliamentary questions, and address issues related to communal harmony and public peace. The Special Privileges Committee will be chaired by BJP legislator Pradyumn Singh Rajput, adding another layer of oversight on members’ rights and privileges.
In a statement, Speaker Gupta highlighted the importance of the newly formed committees, saying they would “strengthen the legislative process and ensure rigorous scrutiny of issues that affect public welfare.” He emphasized that the committees are designed to encourage systematic debate and thorough examination of policies before they become law.
The formation of these committees comes at a time when the Delhi Assembly is increasingly active on matters ranging from urban infrastructure to health services. By distributing chairmanships proportionally, the Secretariat aims to foster collaborative governance while respecting the democratic mandate of both the ruling party and the opposition.
With the BJP holding a clear majority, the party’s influence over most committees is expected to shape the legislative agenda for the coming year. However, the AAP’s control of the two document‑related committees provides it with strategic leverage on legislative drafting and transparency issues.
Analysts note that the proportional representation model used for committee assignments mirrors the overall composition of the Assembly and could set a precedent for future sessions. It also reflects a broader trend in Indian state legislatures to balance efficiency with inclusivity.
Overall, the 32 committees are slated to begin their work immediately, with the first meetings scheduled for the first week of July 2026. Their performance will be closely watched by political observers, civil society groups, and the general public, all keen to see how effectively they can monitor government actions and contribute to the state’s development agenda.
